Evan Martin (evan) wrote in evan_tech,
Evan Martin
evan
evan_tech

haskell syntax idea

I often end up with nested parens, when I need binding on the right:
foo (bar (baz (etc x)))
That's ok in Lisp where the parens become invisible, but parens are infrequent enough in Haskell that they're ugly. So they provide an "apply" operator that just has different binding rules, and the above can be written:
foo $ bar $ baz $ etc x
but the dollar signs are huge! If it were colon, it could be written like this
foo: bar: baz: etc x
Where the colon instinctively means: "I'm done supplying arguments to this function; everything to the right of here is its final argument."
Tags: haskell
Subscribe

  • memcache job offers

    I get occasional recruiter spam that specifically calls out "my work on memcached". This is pretty funny because all I did was make some trivial…

  • closest computer

    I have a computer in the closet that serves music. I haven't thought much about the computer as I've used it -- I just know it's always available on…

  • application stack

    "Put yourself in 1995. I'm going to tell the you of 1995 that in 2010, there will be a software platform with the following properties:" Luis Villa…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 10 comments

  • memcache job offers

    I get occasional recruiter spam that specifically calls out "my work on memcached". This is pretty funny because all I did was make some trivial…

  • closest computer

    I have a computer in the closet that serves music. I haven't thought much about the computer as I've used it -- I just know it's always available on…

  • application stack

    "Put yourself in 1995. I'm going to tell the you of 1995 that in 2010, there will be a software platform with the following properties:" Luis Villa…