Evan Martin (evan) wrote in evan_tech,
Evan Martin

[x] is better

"Objective study" on why all should be using lisp. They do mention what seems to me to be the flaw, though: people who know lisp tend to be better programmers.

I mostly mention that because we keep making jokes about how our PL class is mostly about why we should use ML. Whenever we see a question on an assignment like "Can you do [x] in another language [safely, efficiently, etc.]?" we know the answer is already "no".

Jokes aside, it's only because the class focuses on the advantages of more advanced type systems (existential types, polymorphism) and why stuff like immutability is useful, and ML is just a good example of such a system.

  • blog moved

    As described elsewhere, I've quit LiveJournal. If you're interested in my continuing posts, you should look at one of these (each contains feed…

  • dremel

    They published a paper on Dremel, my favorite previously-unpublished tool from the Google toolchest. Greg Linden discusses it: "[...] it is capable…

  • treemaps

    I finally wrote up my recent adventures in treemapping, complete with nifty clickable visualizations.

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.