evan_tech

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
04:05 pm, 15 Jan 04

breaking ocaml

The guy next to me was learning SML for his intro to programming languages class, so I tried to impress on him how awesome and fundamentally mind-altering it was. But he hadn't encountered a functional language before so he couldn't see why type inference was so neat.

chris_one pointed me at a paper that eventually led to me producing this OCaml gem:

Note that we never actually use x, and instead just assign to q. So the ensuing grinding is just a product of the type-inferencer.
let q = 
let x = 1 in
let x1 = (x, x) in 
let x2 = (x1, x1) in
let x3 = (x2, x2) in
let x4 = (x3, x3) in
let x5 = (x4, x4) in
let x6 = (x5, x5) in
let x7 = (x6, x6) in
let x8 = (x7, x7) in
let x9 = (x8, x8) in
let x10 = (x9, x9) in
let x11 = (x10, x10) in
let x12 = (x11, x11) in
let x13 = (x12, x12) in
let x14 = (x13, x13) in
let x15 = (x14, x14) in
let x16 = (x15, x15) in
let x17 = (x16, x16) in
let x18 = (x17, x17) in
let x19 = (x18, x18) in
let x20 = (x19, x19) in
x20 in
1


Reminds me a lot of that "million laughs" XML attack, where you create entities that expand recursively.